![]() The views in these articles are those of the author alone and do not reflect the position of the U.S. Davis is a widely published analyst on national security and foreign policy. In the name of advancing women’s rights we cannot risk diminishing the capabilities of ground combat units.ĭaniel L. It can be argued that in some cases women are smarter and more clever than men! In areas of the military not requiring physical strength or stamina, a woman ought to be able to compete on an equal footing with a man. There is no issue with a women’s intellectual quality or value as a human being. Let the enemy be Russia, China or a few other armed forces and the situation changes dramatically. In such an environment, you can do almost anything to a combat unit and it’ll successfully accomplish its mission. military will never face an existential fight and will thus never risk being driven from the field. If the only enemy the United States ever faced was an insurgent group with no tanks, no artillery battalions, no attack helicopters, no jets and no formal logistics systems, then the U.S. ![]() There would likely be few women who would be able to perform those tasks. In 2011, while serving in Afghanistan I observed infantrymen on patrol who had to carry up to 100lbs of body armor and equipment. Includes any semi-automatic rifle that can use a detachable magazine with at least two of the following: folding or telescoping stock, bayonet mount, flash suppressor or threaded barrel, or grenade launcher. Even when no sexual acts take place, there will certainly be considerable sexual tension among that crew.įollowing Desert Storm I served in a field artillery unit, where gunners and crewmembers had to carry 103lb 155mm shells for the howitzers. Assault firearms (banned list) also includes firearms substantially identical to a firearm on the ban list. Some will engage in consensual sex, some number of other men will force themselves on women via sexual assaults or outright rape. According to numerous studies, that age range lines up almost exactly with the height of male sexual desire.Ĭonfining men and women of that age in combat or training environments and expect there to be no sexual interaction is naïve. The vast majority of armored crewmen, infantrymen, and artillerymen are roughly between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five. No matter what anyone may desire to be true, it would be inviting disaster to put mixed men and women in such intimate settings and expect there to be no friction. In determining if this restriction has unfairly prevented women from filling those roles, it is instructive to examine comparisons to other male-only organizations. The 10 percent of the jobs that have been restricted to men-only were the frontline, direct combat roles requiring significant physical strength such as infantry, artillery and armor. In fact I think they will be a stronger force, because a more diverse force is a stronger force.” Evidence, logic and experience says these hopes will not be realized.Īpproximately 90 percent of all military occupations have already been open to women for quite some time. He said that, as commander in chief, he knows “this change, like others before it, will again make our military even stronger.” Echoing that sentiment, Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus argued that lifting the ban is “not going to make any less fighting effective. President Obama commended the December 3 decision by Secretary of Defense Ash Carter to open all combat jobs to women.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |